Athene Network and Laetitude, two prominent companies in the field of MLM. However major concerns have been raised about their operational procedures and legitimacy. The ownership structures of both businesses are opaque, which keeps prospective affiliates in the dark about important decision-making procedures.
Their business models place a strong emphasis on recruiting rather than offering tangible goods or services, which leads to a situation in which the bulk of affiliates lose money but top-tier affiliates may profit. Investors need to be on the lookout for developments in the MLM landscape since promises of rapid profits frequently mask more serious hazards. This article explores the workings of Athene Network and Laetitude, emphasising the concerning elements that should cause investors to take notice.
Laetitude: Credibility Concerns in a Dubious Business Landscape
Laetitude operates through Spring7 FZ LLC, a shell company registered in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Known for its lenient regulatory environment, the UAE has become a haven for dubious business practices, making it an attractive location for scams and fraudulent schemes. This backdrop raises critical questions about the credibility and legitimacy of Laetitude’s operations. As potential investors seek opportunities in the MLM landscape, understanding the implications of such a company structure is essential to navigating the risks involved. This backdrop raises significant questions about Laetitude’s credibility and the legitimacy of its operations
David El Dib: A Controversial Figure in MLM with Ties to the BitClub Ponzi Scheme
David El Dib’s association with the BitClub Network, a notorious Ponzi scheme, significantly tarnishes his credibility as a founder. The BitClub Network operated from 2014 to 2019, promising investors lucrative returns from Bitcoin mining. However, it was eventually revealed that the scheme defrauded investors of approximately $722 million, primarily relying on funds from new investors to pay returns to earlier ones—classic Ponzi structure.
El Dib’s involvement with BitClub included promotional activities where he spoke at events alongside its founders, who now face serious criminal charges. This connection suggests not only a questionable ethical stance but also raises concerns about El Dib’s business practices and intentions. Investors may find it alarming that someone with a background linked to such a significant fraud is now at the helm of another venture.
Product Offering
One of the most glaring issues is that Laetitude does not offer any retail products or services; affiliates can only market the company’s membership. This raises questions about the sustainability of its operations.
Compensation Plan
Affiliates are encouraged to invest in a crypto trading bot with tiers ranging from $500 to $50,000. The compensation structure includes:
- Recruitment Commissions: Affiliates earn 10% on fees from recruits.
- Residual Commissions: A binary structure allows earnings based on recruitment team sales, with potential weekly caps at $20,000 for top affiliates.
Risk Factors
The lack of retail products and heavy reliance on recruitment commissions suggest that Laetitude operates similarly to a Ponzi scheme. Promises of high returns from a trading bot, particularly from individuals with dubious backgrounds, further compound these concerns.
Red Flags on Laetitude’s Website
The Laetitude website exhibits several warning signs:
1. Lack of Specific Information: The website provides vague and generic information about achieving financial freedom without offering concrete details or evidence of its claims.
2. Unrealistic Promises: The website’s emphasis on “the largest redistribution of wealth in history” and promises of financial freedom through small investments and daily learning are common tactics used by fraudulent schemes.
3. Investment Calculator: The disclaimer about the example calculator not reflecting actual payments or earnings is a red flag. Legitimate financial institutions provide accurate and transparent calculators.
4. High Profit Rate: Claiming an average profit rate of 1% per annum may seem modest, but it’s important to note that consistent high returns with low risk are unrealistic in the financial world.
5. Daily Learning Units: The promise of receiving daily nuggets of invaluable information is a common tactic used by scams to keep users engaged and invested in the platform.
6. Exclusive Community: Claims of joining an exclusive community with opportunities to exchange information and network can be a way to create a sense of belonging and trust, even in fraudulent schemes.
7. Vision and Mission: The website’s emphasis on vision, wealth, and community without substantial details or evidence can be a tactic to appeal to users’ aspirations without providing real value.
8. Lack of Transparency: The website does not provide clear information about its founders, team, or specific investment strategies, which is common in fraudulent schemes.
9. Legal and Support Pages: While the website has links to legal and support pages, the content and legitimacy of these pages should be thoroughly verified.
10. Domain Age and SSL Certificate: While the domain age and SSL certificate from Amazon are not inherently suspicious, they do not guarantee the legitimacy of the website.
Athene Network: Concerns Over Transparency
Athene Network has quickly garnered attention in the MLM landscape, primarily due to its lack of transparency. Registered privately in July 2023, the company misleadingly claims its roadmap dates back to 2021, raising doubts about its credibility. Focused on regions like Indonesia and the US, Athene employs AI avatars and generic marketing strategies, further signaling low-effort engagement.
With no retail products or services offered, its business model relies heavily on recruitment, echoing characteristics typical of unsustainable schemes. Affiliates mine GEM tokens through a mobile app, adding complexity to its legitimacy. Given the frequent rule changes and concerning withdrawal policies, potential investors should approach Athene Network with caution.
Traffic and Marketing
Traffic to Athene Network primarily comes from countries like Indonesia and the US, with marketing materials featuring AI avatars—often indicative of low-effort scams.
Product Offering
Similar to Laetitude, Athene Network offers no retail products; affiliates can only market membership, indicating a heavy reliance on recruitment for revenue.
Compensation Plan
Affiliates mine GEM tokens via an app by clicking a button daily. These tokens are converted to ATH tokens, which hold no external value. The compensation model includes two-level referral commissions on $3 fees to bypass KYC restrictions.
..from our sponsor..
DO YOU KNOW YERKIN TATISHEV
Yerkin Tatishev has faced allegations of corruption and financial misconduct, including accusations of self-dealing through BTA Bank and laundering money via offshore companies, raising concerns about the legality of his business practices….
Read More About Yerkin Tatishev
Withdrawal Restrictions and Scam Concerns
Athene Network Raises Serious Scam Concerns
Athene Network has raised serious red flags, with reports indicating it could be a scam project. In its early stages, users were encouraged to purchase mining packages—Copper, Silver, Gold, and Diamond—to enhance their mining capabilities. Here’s a breakdown of the alleged scam tactics:
1. Withdrawal Limits Based on Membership Levels
Initially, users could withdraw their $ATH by opening a package membership and recharging their accounts. However, within a month, withdrawal capabilities were restricted, leaving many users unable to access their funds.
2. Ponzi Scheme Dynamics
The platform appears to operate like a typical Ponzi scheme, using funds from new users to buy its own MEME tokens, specifically $LION. This token was launched at a very low price, suggesting illegal fundraising practices.
3. Continuous Token Issuance
After replacing $ATH with $GEM, Athene Network introduced the $LION meme token and recently launched another token, $ATX. This strategy seems aimed at exploiting the meme market while leaving investors with worthless assets.
4. Trapping New Users
The platform’s rules are frequently modified, making it difficult for users to participate meaningfully. Early adopters may have profited, but newer participants find their investments locked, often encouraged to keep recharging to avoid total losses.
5. Insider Trading and Manipulation
Project members’ addresses are undisclosed, allowing them to engage in trading and market manipulation without scrutiny. Reports suggest they may benefit from airdrops and provide false investment information.
Lessons Learned from Laetitude and Athene Network in the MLM Landscape
In summary, both Laetitude and Athene Network represent troubling entries in the MLM landscape, marked by significant red flags that raise serious concerns about their legitimacy. Their reliance on opaque ownership structures, coupled with a business model that prioritizes recruitment over tangible product offerings, suggests a precarious foundation for potential investors.
Laetitude’s connection to founder David El Dib and his questionable history with the BitClub Network amplifies concerns about ethical business practices and transparency. Meanwhile, Athene Network’s rapid emergence and misleading claims about its operational timeline further compound suspicions regarding its intentions.
Both companies exhibit classic characteristics of Ponzi schemes, such as promises of high returns, restrictive withdrawal policies, and a lack of verifiable, legitimate products or services. As these MLM schemes continue to evolve, it is imperative for prospective investors to remain vigilant and conduct thorough due diligence before becoming involved. In a landscape rife with opportunities that sound too good to be true, exercising caution is not only wise but essential for safeguarding one’s time and financial well-being. Avoiding Laetitude and Athene Network is advisable for anyone seeking to engage in sustainable and ethical investment practices.
Disclaimer:
This article has been syndicated from the Critical Intel Network. The views, opinions, and statements expressed in guest posts are solely those of the individual authors and do not reflect this website’s official policy, position, or beliefs. The content is published in its original form to uphold our commitment to free speech. However, this website does not guarantee, verify, or take responsibility for any content from syndicated sources regarding accuracy, dependability, or legality.
Pursuant to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), this website, as an interactive computer service, is exempt from liability for user-generated content, including syndicated articles. While we are dedicated to maintaining an open and inclusive platform, we reserve the right to remove content that violates our terms of service or applicable laws. Users are advised to perform their due diligence before relying on or taking any action based on the content published herein.
For any corrections or to report abuse, kindly contact us here.
