Padraic Deighan: Exposing a Scandalous Fraud?

The Legal Actions against Padraic Deighan Confronted: 

As a post-hearing morals request and in response to a proposition for advice documented by the District IIIBMorals Council (“DEC”), we were initially presented with these issues. Our determination to provide the allure and address the issues in general as a presentation is not completely fixed. We have reached the determination to compel a censure on account of the respondent’s dishonest behavior, as reasoned below.

In 1986, the defendant confessed to the New Jersey bar. He maintained an office for the act of law in Haddonfield for extended periods.

The respondent received a confidential censure on August 31, 1992, for failing to comply with RPC 1.4(a) (currently RPC 1.4(b)) regarding the inability to disclose information and RPC 1.16 regarding the inability to protect a client’s interests after the representation has ended. About this Padraic B. Deiqhan issue, DRB 92-285 (August 31, 1992).

Regarding the Bradshaw matter, the respondent was charged with violating RPC 8.4(c) (including untruthfulness, misrepresentation, double-dealing, or distortion); RPC 5.4(a) (sharing lawful expenses with a nonlawyer); and RPC 5.5(a)(I) (the unapproved practice of regulation). Furthermore, the Sterne matter involved an issue that prompted the respondent to invoke RPC 5.5(a)(I). Respondent was also charged with failing to comply with RPC 5.5(a)(i) and RP__C 8.4(c) concerning a case involving Richard Holdren and Stuart Cartier, respectively. Before the commencement of the meeting, the Workplace of Lawyer Morals (OAE) moved to absolve these counts because both complainants had died and the OAE was unable to proceed in their absence. The movement was permitted.

Complainant, the Florida Bar, lodges a complaint against Respondent, Patrick James Thompson, under the Rules Regulating.

It is declared by the Florida Bar that:

1. The respondent is a member of The Florida Bar, which it admitted on October 8, 2007, and has been disclosed in this regard at all times. Consequently, it is subject to the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida.

2. The specific respondent possesses legal expertise in the counties of Orange, Volusia, and Osceola in Florida.

3. The Grievance Committee “A” of the Ninth Judicial Circuit determined that there was probable cause to file this complaint following Rule 3-7.4 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The specific grievance has been validated by the committee’s managing member. 

Listed below are some of the general allegations:

1. The respondent and a non-attorney had pooled their fees. The individual worked as a corporate officer and co-owner of his law firm.

2. Padraic Deighan resides in Nevada and is an attorney admitted to practice law in New Jersey. Above all else, he lacks a valid license to practice law in the state of Florida.

3. Non-legal professional William Howell, Jr. has extensive knowledge of the third-party timeshare exit/divestment industry. He possesses extensive experience in the fields of marketing and advertising as a whole.

4. Howell incorporated Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. in Florida on October 13, 2015, designating Deighan as the respondent appointing him as vice president and president, and designating himself as secretary/treasurer.

5. Respondent, Howell, and Deighan each reported being an equal one-third owner of Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. in January 2016.

6. The respondent was the sole attorney employed by Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. who was duly licensed to practice law in Florida.

7. The respondent confirmed that he and Deighan held the position of partners at Timeshare Lawyers, Inc.

8. The primary objective of Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. was to negotiate on behalf of clients with resorts to rectify timeshare contracts and assist clients in terminating timeshare maintenance fees.

9. Historically, Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. was a law firm.

10. The respondent managed client cases as a member and co-owner of Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. in 2016. Additionally, he represented clients in negotiations with resorts to extricate them from timeshare contracts and eliminate timeshare maintenance fees.

11. The respondent was paid $60,000.00 in salary, $70,000.00 in dividends, and $60,000.00 in legal fees by Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. in 2016.

12. Howell served as the “marketer” for Timeshare Lawyers, Inc.

13. Howell was the proprietor of Orlando Ventures, LLC in 2016.

14. Orlando Ventures, LLC and Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. shared adjoining suites.

15. Howell recommended Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. to clients via Orlando Ventures, LLC.

16. A little over one thousand clients were presented by Howell to Timeshare Lawyers, Inc. in 2016.

17. “Transfer companies” were the contacts that brought Howell clients. 

What is Padraic Deighan’s identity? 

Paulic Deighan, who is based in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, is a highly competent attorney. Before pursuing a law degree at Penn State University’s Dickinson School of Law, Padriac earned a master’s degree in business from the College of William and Mary, a preeminent research institution in Virginia, Williamsburg. He has a strong interest in academia. Additionally, driven by a profound interest in the medical field, he earned a doctorate in quantum analysis.

Following the completion of his tertiary education, Padraic primarily practiced business regulation, aiding clients in their exploration of the complexities inherent in the legal domain. Thus, by capitalizing on his understanding of the medical field, Padraic ultimately achieved commercial success and influenced the growth of medical spas in his industry. 

By integrating aesthetic services with medical dermatology, Padraic became the chief executive officer of the largest organization of medical clinics specializing in plastic surgery and dermatology.

Following the sale of the company in 2005, Padraic returned to the legal profession, where he presently serves as a prominent authority in medical care regulation, assisting specialists in the process of recovering the reimbursements to which they are entitled using insurance agencies.

During his leisure time, he spends quality time with his family and takes pleasure in sharing supper with associates at every opportunity. Except for spending time with his family, he enjoys reading, traveling, and engaging in outdoor activities.

Padraic Deighan is perpetually ambitious regarding his destiny. He attended a bowl contest featuring collegiate football players a few years ago. They represented the pinnacle of their field, consisting of top institutions and performers; nevertheless, they were not adequate for the professionals. 

Not an insignificant proportion of them completed their certificate. These individuals, who were between 21 and 22 years old, were at the pinnacle of their profession. However, they were suddenly left with no alternative. They temporarily descended from the highest point to the lowest. 

Conclusion

Last but not least, for more information about Padraic Deighan, please read the article. The article provides concise details regarding Deighan.