Jason Colodne Cobleck: A Scammer? (2024)

The Company’s co-founder, Jason Colodne, has 28 years of expertise in the financial industry, with more than 25 of those years spent focusing on rare and difficult situations. As the lead transaction partner, he portrays himself as in charge of managing the portfolio, paperwork, and due diligence among other facets of investment execution.

Jason Colodne had been employed at well-known financial institutions before joining the Firm. Serving as both the division’s founder and managing director, he was instrumental in determining the course of Morgan Stanley’s Strategic Finance division. He oversaw the Hybrid Lending Business in the Fixed Income Currency and Commodities Divisions at Goldman Sachs and oversaw the Distressed Research and Investing Desk before that. Investment banking, leverage finance, and credit investing are all part of his experience. The University of Pennsylvania produced Jason Colodne.

Furthermore, Jason Colodne has participated in many boards and committees outside of his professional activities. Participating in steering groups for restructuring, he has held positions on the boards of multiple portfolio companies. Along with serving on the board of directors of the Centurion Foundation and the Children’s Tumor Foundation, he is an active member of the Young Professionals Organization New York (YPO).

Jason Colodne Cobleck: About Colbeck Capital

Colbeck Capital asserts that it is an expert in providing loans to enterprises that are in transition. According to Jason Colodne Colbeck, the Colbeck team has observed an increase in the number of businesses that are experiencing difficulties and need financial assistance. 

It is not uncommon for there to be a time-sensitive capital requirement that cannot be satisfied by traditional financing.”Furthermore, while these companies may have sufficient collateral value to back the loans, they may have some form of complication in their credit narrative that makes ordinary way financings tough to find,” Jason stated in a Bloomberg interview earlier this month.

When traditional sources of finance are limited, the members of the Colbeck team assert and describe that the company offers strategic investment to firms during periods of transformation. This funding is provided to enterprises during times of transition. Colbeck asserts that it can generate and invest in strategic loans by utilizing a vast network of industry links, innovative deal origination, bespoke credit structuring, and significant experience in dealing with extraordinary circumstances.

Additionally, Colbeck Capital Management asserts that it is a strategic lending asset manager, and this is how it is characterized in the media. Colbeck asserts that it was established in 2009 and states that it “partners with companies during periods of transition, providing creative and highly structured capital solutions to meet the evolving needs of these companies.” 

The level of scrutiny and portfolio management that Colbeck employs is comparable to that of standard private equity firms. This is because the investments that Colbeck makes are difficult to understand. As part of its due diligence procedures, it routinely conducts market studies conducted by a third party, accounting, and legal investigations, internally developed financial modeling and projections, and intensive on-site and management due diligence.

Relativity Media claims lender pre-bankruptcy control bid 

(Source)

In July, Relativity Media LLC, a major U.S. film studio, filed for bankruptcy after accusing its senior lender and two former executives of a secret conspiracy to undercut its refinancing efforts.

In bankruptcy documents, Relativity claimed that lender Colbeck Capital Management hired former CFO Andrew Matthews and production chief Matthew Alvarez to disrupt the studio’s debt restructuring.

After helping Relativity expand and produce films with a $350 million debt-financing agreement, Colbeck had two seats on the board since 2012. In May, CEO Ryan Kavanaugh removed Colbeck and its representatives from the board for promoting misinformation.

The executives and Colbeck are accused of conspiracy and fiduciary duty breach. Relativity claims Colbeck did not inform the company of its takeover plans.

The argument emerges as Relativity seeks Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief in early February. The studio will show U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Michael Wiles its viability on February 1.

Manchester Securities told the court this week that Relativity likely lacks exit finance despite its hopeful assertions.

Colbeck allegedly pulled equity and loan funds from Relativity for its secret plan, according to court records.

Matthews, Alvarez, and Colbeck declined to comment.

Relativity, which made “The Fighter,” filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy owing to box office flops.

For $125 million, founder and CEO Ryan Kavanaugh ceded the studio’s TV division to senior lenders and agreed to a debt-for-equity swap to recapture its film, music, and sports operations.

The restructuring plan needs creditor and bankruptcy court approval.

Kavanaugh saw Relativity as a cutting-edge studio for finance, distribution, music publishing, and sports entertainment since 2004.

During bankruptcy, Relativity has fought Millennium Film, a co-producer of “Hunter Killer.” However, the two companies agreed to continue filming.

Bankruptcy case Relativity Fashion LLC is in the Southern District of New York. Relativity will raise financing before February 1, according to a source.

Relativity Media

The American media company Relativity Media was founded in 2004 by Ryan Kavanaugh and Lynwood Spinks. After initially specializing in film funding, the company branched out into film production and beyond. The company had great financial success before its demise.

In 2015, Relativity Media declared Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a result of litigation and late loan payments. Word on the street was that this bankruptcy was “one of the most infamous in the entertainment industry.” This led the company to start selling previously bought films. After coming out of bankruptcy in March 2016, Relativity Media restructured and re-filed in May 2018. Under UltraV Holdings’ ownership, the studio is currently fully operational.

A film lender claims that Colbeck Capital supported Ryan Kavanaugh’s “Ponzi scheme.” 

RKA Film Financing has submitted an updated lawsuit to a court in New York, alleging that Colbeck Capital and officials from Relativity Media were involved in a scheme to deceive investors. The case was filed in New York. Ryan Kavanaugh, the creator of Relativity, is accused of diverting monies that were intended for film-release financing to finance his extravagant lifestyle, according to the lawsuit.

In the case, it is stated that Colbeck, which was led by Jason Colodne and Jason Beckman, was successful in convincing RKA to lend Relativity $81 million to promote and distribute certain films. On the other hand, it is alleged that the monies were channeled to finance corporate expenses as well as personal pleasures, such as Kavanaugh’s helicopters and mansion.

Using the loan monies to establish a facade of financial stability while concealing the true financial state of the company, RKA argues that Relativity and its executives misrepresented the usage of the loan funds. In the case, it is alleged that Colbeck concealed vital information on the imminent collapse of Relativity, even though he was aware that the loan funds were currently in jeopardy.

In addition, the complaint asserts that the majority of the money that was loaned was misappropriated and that only a small portion of the money was used for the advertising of the film. RKA asserts that it did not uncover the misappropriation of funds until April, which prompted the organization to initiate legal proceedings against Kavanaugh and other persons implicated.

Throughout the litigation, Kavanaugh is shown to have regularly provided misleading assurances regarding the state of the company’s finances, which creates a picture of Relativity’s lack of financial oversight and dishonesty. According to the legal counsel for RKA, the complaint, which was submitted after several months of attempting to find a solution to the problem, is intended to hold Kavanaugh and his accomplices accountable for illegal activity.

According to the lawsuit, “MindGeek is a classic criminal enterprise run, in the words of those who know it best, ‘just like the Sopranos.’

A group of thirty-four women has accused Visa, MindGeek, its executives, and the Canadian parent company of Pornhub of aiding and abetting child pornography and human trafficking. They have launched a federal racketeering case against all of them. MindGeek is accused in the lawsuit of functioning as a criminal enterprise akin to “The Sopranos,” making money through illegal activities.

The lawsuit alleges that banker Bernd Bergmair, CEO of MindGeek Feras Antoon, and other unnamed persons are the “bosses” and “over-bosses” of the company, directing its illegal operations while hiding their involvement.

Hedge fund Colbeck Capital is involved in the case because it approved a $350 million loan that supported MindGeek’s activities. The loan, which was backed by the business’s assets, is said to have enabled MindGeek to carry doing its illicit operations despite being investigated by the law.

The complaint claims that MindGeek has a criminal past that dates back to its founding and includes investigations into money laundering and seizures by the authorities. The corporation’s attempts to hide its illegal activity are attributed to Fabian Thylman’s takeover of the company and the debt restructuring that followed through Colbeck Capital.

Visa is also accused in the case of being a part of the conspiracy by helping MindGeek with its financial transactions, which allowed the company to make money off of illicit activity.

Visa and MindGeek have refuted the claims, and Pornhub has emphasized that it has a zero-tolerance policy for illegal content. Requests for comment from Colbeck Capital have not received a response.

The case reveals the vast network of alleged illicit behavior carried out by MindGeek and its partners and asks for $110 million in damages.

Accusation Leveled Against Visa: Trafficking Profits  

The lawsuit identifies Visa as a defendant in the racketeering scheme because of its profit margin from the trafficking endeavor.

“The financial institutions processing the transactions through which MindGeek’s trafficking venture monetized the content were uniquely situated to prevent MindGeek’s trafficking venture.” According to the complaint, Visa and Mastercard, two significant American credit card corporations, topped the list.

The New York Times exposé exposed the power of credit card companies, which prompted Ackman’s intervention.

Nevertheless, the complaint asserts that Visa and Mastercard were not surprised by the exposé. “For over a decade, they had been well aware of the facts revealed by the New York Times, and instead of insisting that MindGeek commercialize only legal consensual content and comply with relevant US laws, they chose instead to facilitate and profit from the MindGeek trafficking venture.”

All Mastercard transactions with Pornhub have been terminated. Visa hasn’t followed through, though. “Even today, Visa continues to process payments for MindGeek pay sites that are themselves rife with trafficking and are promoted, marketed, and sustained by the MindGeek trafficking venture,” the complaint states.

The lawsuit claims that because of their compliance efforts, financial institutions were made aware of actual occurrences of pornography and human trafficking. Tens of thousands of other films displaying the same content might be easily found, with no way of knowing whether the content was a consensual portrayal of a nonconsensual occurrence or non-consensual. “Well, since its inception, all one had to do was visit MindGeek’s tube sites to see tens of thousands of videos (with the help of MindGeek’s suggested search and video algorithm) depicting subjects who were underage, under duress, incapacitated, being raped, or secretly exploited.”

As per the assessment, these entities “were uniquely capable and in the best position to understand this.” “They were aware of it, too. They opted to engage in business with MindGeek and profit from its trafficking endeavor.”

Ultimately, in December of last year, Mastercard discovered through its investigation that Pornhub was acting unlawfully. Nevertheless, the complaint claims that Visa only acknowledged “allegations of illegal activity,” failing to move further. “Visa’s inquiry discovered the same thing and more, but it refused to publicly admit this fact because it wanted to continue doing business with, and benefitting from, MindGeek’s trafficking endeavor.” That’s exactly what it did.”

Visa did not respond to a request for comment. Nevertheless, it had earlier said the following:

“Until the conclusion of our ongoing investigation, Visa’s suspension of acceptance privileges for Pornhub and other MindGeek content-sharing platforms that host user-generated content remains in effect.” Processing all legitimate transactions is Visa’s commitment. It is essential for the free flow of trade that the global platform maintains its legal neutrality.”

In their statement to II, Pornhub also said, “We stand resolutely with all victims of internet-related abuse.” Pornhub treats all complaints, including the ones made by the plaintiffs in this case, regarding platform misuse seriously. As it happens, Pornhub has put in place some of the strictest security measures ever seen on a user-generated platform. These measures include forbidding unverified user uploads, expanding our moderation procedures, and working with numerous non-profit groups worldwide. Pornhub has a safety and security policy that surpasses that of any other major online platform, and we do not intend to allow the lawsuit’s bombastic rhetoric and racist overtones to undermine that fact.” 

Human Trafficking

The term “human trafficking” refers to the practice of trading people to exploit them sexually, using them for forced labor, or sexual slavery. It is possible for human trafficking to take place both inside and outside of a country! In contrast to people smuggling, which necessitates the assent of the person being smuggled, this practice does not require consent.

Although legal protection varies from country to country, international conventions condemn human trafficking as a violation of human rights. Across the globe, this pattern of behavior has resulted in the exploitation of millions of individuals.

Conclusion 

To sum up, the legal proceedings and allegations concerning Jason Colodne, Colbeck Capital, Relativity Media, and MindGeek have illuminated intricate financial transactions, purported fraudulent undertakings, and grave ethical issues in the domains of finance, entertainment, and digital content.

Lawsuits filed against Colbeck Capital and its investment in Relativity Media and other companies point to a history of dishonest business dealings and financial mismanagement that resulted in large losses and legal troubles. The charges made against MindGeek and Visa, meanwhile, bring attention to the alarming problem of human trafficking and exploitation in the online pornographic sector and cast doubt on the role that financial institutions should play in supporting these kinds of operations.

All things considered, these incidents highlight how crucial it is for all facets of business and finance to be transparent, morally upright, and accountable. Companies must put integrity and adherence to the law and ethical standards first to protect people and communities and to continue being trusted and respected in the marketplace.