What Happened?
Jared Jeffrey Davis, a co-owner of a binary options company, has made significant efforts to erase traces of his controversial past, which is marked by serious allegations and criminal charges. According to multiple reports from the U.S. Department of Justice, AtoZ Markets, and the SEC, Davis has been involved in fraudulent activities related to binary options, including charges of tax evasion and investor fraud. His company, which promised high returns on investments, misled numerous clients, resulting in substantial financial losses.
Davis was arrested and sentenced to prison for his role in orchestrating a binary options fraud that defrauded investors out of millions of dollars. The scheme included making false claims about the safety and profitability of investments, concealing critical information, and failing to disclose the risks involved. In addition, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought charges against Davis, accusing him of violating securities laws through deceitful practices.
Since his conviction, Davis has reportedly engaged in various attempts to suppress negative information about his past, utilizing legal threats and other tactics to remove damaging news articles and silence criticism. These efforts appear to be aimed at preserving his public image and preventing further reputational damage, despite the severity of his actions and their impact on investors.
Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)
Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.
List of Fake Copyright Notices for Jared Jeffrey Davis
Evidence and Screenshots
How do we investigate fake DMCA notices?
To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.
FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.
What was Jared Jeffrey Davis trying to hide?
Jared Jeffrey Davis is a former co-owner and CEO of a binary options company involved in fraudulent financial practices. He gained notoriety for his role in orchestrating fraudulent schemes that misled investors, ultimately leading to significant financial losses for those who trusted his company’s services. Davis’s operations primarily involved binary options, a type of financial instrument that has frequently been associated with deceptive practices. His criminal activities have led to multiple legal actions, including charges brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Based on information from sources like the U.S. Department of Justice, AtoZ Markets, Leaprate, and the SEC, Jared Jeffrey Davis appears to be attempting to hide the following adverse news and allegations:
- Binary Options Fraud: Jared Jeffrey Davis has been accused and convicted of operating a binary options fraud scheme that deceived numerous investors. The fraudulent activities involved misrepresenting the nature and profitability of the investments, promising high returns with little risk while concealing the actual dangers. According to the SEC and the Department of Justice, Davis used deceitful tactics to lure investors, many of whom ultimately lost their money. The fraud charges are a key aspect of Davis’s attempts to erase or downplay his shady past.
- Criminal Conviction for Tax Evasion: In addition to the fraud charges, Davis was also convicted of tax evasion. The U.S. Department of Justice reported that he failed to report substantial income derived from his fraudulent activities, evading taxes on the ill-gotten gains. This criminal conviction led to a prison sentence, further tarnishing his reputation and exposing the depth of his illegal conduct. The conviction for tax evasion is a critical element of his criminal record that Davis appears eager to suppress.
- Legal Actions by the SEC: The SEC filed charges against Davis for violations of federal securities laws. These charges included making false statements to investors, failing to disclose the risks associated with binary options trading, and operating without proper regulatory oversight. The SEC’s enforcement action included penalties and highlighted the illegitimate nature of his operations. Davis has reportedly sought to minimize the visibility of these legal proceedings, given the severity of the findings and their impact on his credibility.
- Negative Publicity and Bad Reviews: Many individuals who invested with Davis’s binary options firm have come forward with complaints and bad reviews, detailing their experiences and financial losses. These investors were promised safe and profitable investment opportunities, only to discover that their funds had been lost or misappropriated. The negative feedback and the volume of complaints about his business practices have prompted Davis to try to censor these reviews to maintain a cleaner public image.
- Efforts to Censor Damaging Information: Jared Jeffrey Davis has reportedly taken steps to suppress information about his fraudulent past. This includes attempts to remove unfavorable news articles, intimidate individuals who have spoken out, and limit the spread of damaging information through legal threats. By trying to censor coverage of his criminal activities and fraud allegations, Davis aims to prevent potential future investors from discovering the extent of his fraudulent actions.
Davis’s actions, which include orchestrating a fraudulent scheme, evading taxes, and facing regulatory action from the SEC, paint a picture of an individual intent on exploiting the financial system for personal gain. His attempts to hide his past and censor damaging news highlight his unwillingness to face accountability and the continuing risks for anyone considering engaging in any future ventures with him.
Only Jared Jeffrey Davis benefits from this crime.
Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Jared Jeffrey Davis from Google, we assume Jared Jeffrey Davis or someone associated with Jared Jeffrey Davis is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Jared Jeffrey Davis. In this case, Jared Jeffrey Davis, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.
How do we counteract this malpractice?
Once we ascertain the involvement of Jared Jeffrey Davis (or actors working on behalf of Jared Jeffrey Davis), we will inform Jared Jeffrey Davis of our findings via Electronic Mail.
Our preliminary assessment suggests that Jared Jeffrey Davis may have engaged a third-party reputation management agency or expert, which, either independently or under direct authorization from Jared Jeffrey Davis, initiated efforts to remove adverse online content, including potentially fraudulent DMCA takedown requests. We will extend an opportunity to Jared Jeffrey Davis to provide details regarding their communications with the agency or expert, as well as the identification of the individual(s) responsible for executing these false DMCA notices.
Failure to respond in a timely manner will necessitate a reassessment of our initial assumptions. In such an event, we will be compelled to take appropriate legal action to rectify the unlawful conduct and take the following steps –
- Inform Google about the fraud committed against them.
- Inform the victims of the fake DMCA about their websites.
- Inform relevant law enforcement agencies
- File counter-notices on Google to reinstate the ‘removed’ content
- Publish copies of the ‘removed’ content on our network of 50+ websites
By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Jared Jeffrey Davis and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…
Since Jared Jeffrey Davis made such efforts to hide something online, it seems fit to ensure that this article and our original review of Jared Jeffrey Davis, including but not limited to user contributions, remain a permanent record for anyone interested in Jared Jeffrey Davis.
A case perfect for the Streisand effect…
Potential Consequences for Jared Jeffrey Davis
Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.
Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many s
