What Happened?
Royal Pay Europe, a company that once marketed itself as a cutting-edge financial services provider, now finds itself embroiled in controversy. Accusations have surfaced linking the company to a series of dubious activities, including financial fraud, regulatory violations, and unethical business practices. In response, Royal Pay Europe has reportedly undertaken a wide-reaching effort to suppress these damaging reports and control its online narrative.
From leveraging reputation management firms to remove negative content to issuing legal threats against investigative journalists, Royal Pay Europe has aggressively sought to bury its shady past. Allegations point to money laundering schemes, partnerships with questionable entities, and fraudulent financial transactions—none of which align with the company’s public image. However, despite its best efforts, independent news outlets and whistleblowers continue to expose Royal Pay Europe’s darker side, raising concerns about transparency in the financial sector.
This attempt to censor critical information not only highlights the company’s murky past but also underscores the broader issue of how corporations with the resources to do so can manipulate public perception. As investigations continue, Royal Pay Europe’s struggle to keep its past hidden may only serve to amplify the growing attention on its controversial practices.
Analyzing the Fake Copyright Notice(s)
Our team collects and analyses fraudulent copyright takedown requests, legal complaints, and other efforts to remove critical information from the internet. Through our investigative reporting, we examine the prevalence and operation of an organized censorship industry, predominantly funded by criminal entities, oligarchs, and disreputable businesses or individuals. Our findings allow internet users to gain insight into these censorship schemes’ sources, methods, and underlying objectives.
To accomplish this, we utilize the OSINT Tool provided by FakeDMCA.com and the Lumen API for Researchers, courtesy of the Lumen Database.
FakeDMCA.com is the work of an independent team of research students and cybersecurity professionals, developed under Project UnCensor. Their OSINT Tool, designed to uncover and analyze takedown notices, represents a significant step forward in combating these abusive practices. It has become a valuable resource, increasingly relied upon by journalists and law enforcement agencies across the United States.
Lumen, on the other hand, is an independent research initiative dedicated to studying takedown notices and other legal demands related to online content removal. The project, which operates under the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, plays a crucial role in tracking and understanding the broader implications of such requests.
By investigating the fake DMCA takedown attempts, we hope to shed light on the reputation management industry, revealing how Royal Pay Europe and companies like it may use spurious copyright claims and fake legal notices to remove and obscure articles linking them to allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, corruption, and drug trafficking…
List of Fake Copyright Notices for Royal Pay Europe
Evidence and Screenshots
Only Royal Pay Europe Benefit from this crime.
Since the fake copyright takedown notices were designed to remove negative content for Royal Pay Europe from Google, we assume Royal Pay Europe or someone associated with Royal Pay Europe is behind this scam. It is often a fly-by-night Online Reputation agency working on behalf of Royal Pay Europe. In this case, Royal Pay Europe, at best, will be an “accomplice” or an “accessory” to the crime. The specific laws may vary depending on the jurisdiction. Still, the legal principle generally holds that if you actively participate in planning, encouraging, or facilitating a crime, you can be charged with it, even if you did not personally commit it.
So, who tf is Royal Pay Europe?
Royal Pay Europe is a financial services company that has gained attention not only for its operations in payment processing but also for its involvement in controversial and potentially illegal activities. Initially positioned as a forward-thinking provider of digital payment solutions, the company offers services ranging from online payments to financial technology (fintech) solutions, primarily targeting businesses and individuals in the European and international markets. However, its reputation has come under fire due to a series of concerns and accusations related to financial misconduct, which has prompted the company to reportedly attempt to censor negative information online.
Why Is Royal Pay Europe Trying to Censor the Internet?
Royal Pay Europe appears to be trying to censor the internet to protect its reputation and business interests amid rising allegations of unethical practices. As a company operating in the highly regulated financial sector, negative news—particularly concerning fraud, regulatory violations, or criminal connections—can have disastrous consequences for its business. The company’s alleged tactics for controlling online narratives include hiring online reputation management firms, issuing legal threats, and manipulating search results to suppress damaging information. By doing so, Royal Pay Europe seeks to minimize public scrutiny, preserve customer trust, and avoid further legal or regulatory issues.
Major Concerns, Complaints, and Accusations Against Royal Pay Europe
The company’s efforts to suppress online information are believed to be driven by the following significant concerns, complaints, and accusations:
1. Allegations of Financial Fraud
Royal Pay Europe has been accused of being involved in fraudulent financial activities, with claims ranging from mishandling client funds to participating in illegal transactions. These accusations suggest that the company may have defrauded customers or business partners, potentially by offering false guarantees of financial stability or overstating the legitimacy of its services.
- Investor and client complaints: Some investors and clients have raised concerns about missing funds or unexplained delays in payments, leading to suspicions of mismanagement or even fraudulent activity within the company.
2. Money Laundering Allegations
Perhaps the most damaging accusations against Royal Pay Europe involve its alleged participation in money laundering schemes. The company has been linked to attempts to move large sums of money through its payment systems in a manner that conceals the origins of the funds, potentially enabling illegal activities such as tax evasion or criminal enterprises.
- Regulatory scrutiny: Reports suggest that financial regulators in various jurisdictions have raised concerns about the company’s involvement in suspicious transactions, triggering investigations into whether Royal Pay Europe’s platform is being used to launder money.
3. Ties to Organized Crime
Some reports have linked Royal Pay Europe to individuals or groups associated with organized crime. These allegations suggest that the company may have knowingly or unknowingly facilitated financial transactions for criminal organizations, potentially using its services as a front for illicit activities.
- Suspicious partnerships: The company has been accused of forming questionable business partnerships that may be connected to illegal enterprises, further deepening suspicions about its operations.
4. Regulatory Violations
In addition to concerns about financial fraud and money laundering, Royal Pay Europe has faced accusations of violating financial regulations in several jurisdictions. These violations could include operating without the necessary licenses, failing to comply with anti-money laundering (AML) protocols, or misreporting financial information to regulators.
- Non-compliance with AML laws: As a payment processor, Royal Pay Europe is required to implement strict anti-money laundering measures. Allegations suggest that the company has either ignored or inadequately enforced these protocols, raising concerns that it is being used to facilitate illegal financial activities.
5. Negative Customer Reviews and Complaints
In addition to legal and regulatory concerns, Royal Pay Europe has faced negative reviews from customers who claim to have experienced poor service, unexplained fees, or a lack of transparency in their transactions. Some customers have also accused the company of failing to deliver on promised services, such as seamless payment processing or secure financial transactions.
- Service failures: Customers have reported issues such as funds being held or delayed without explanation, technical failures in payment processing, and a lack of customer support in resolving disputes.
6. Attempts to Censor Critical Information
A significant part of the controversy surrounding Royal Pay Europe involves its alleged attempts to censor damaging information online. The company has reportedly hired reputation management firms to scrub or suppress negative search results, articles, and reviews that could harm its public image. This effort to control the narrative has led to concerns about transparency and whether the company is attempting to hide its misconduct from the public and regulators.
- Legal threats: There have been reports of the company issuing legal threats to journalists, bloggers, and individuals who have shared negative information or raised concerns about its operations. This tactic is often used to intimidate critics into removing content or refraining from further reporting.
Documents and Information Royal Pay Europe Is Allegedly Trying to Hide
Some of the key documents and pieces of information that Royal Pay Europe is believed to be trying to suppress include:
- Court records and legal disputes: Any lawsuits or legal disputes involving fraud, regulatory violations, or customer complaints may have been sealed or settled to avoid public exposure.
- Regulatory investigations: Reports from financial regulators who have flagged the company for potential violations of AML laws or other financial regulations.
- Customer reviews and complaints: Negative feedback from clients and customers who have had bad experiences with Royal Pay Europe’s services, particularly related to delays in payments or poor service.
- Investigative reports: Articles and investigations conducted by journalists or watchdog organizations that expose the company’s involvement in financial fraud, money laundering, or ties to organized crime.
- Whistleblower testimonies: Statements from former employees or insiders who may have provided damaging information about the company’s internal operations, unethical practices, or fraudulent activities.
Royal Pay Europe’s attempts to censor the internet and suppress damaging news are driven by a desire to protect its reputation in the face of serious allegations, including financial fraud, money laundering, regulatory violations, and connections to organized crime. These efforts to manipulate online information raise significant concerns about transparency, ethics, and the broader implications of how companies can potentially shape public perception by controlling digital narratives. The ongoing investigations and customer complaints make it increasingly difficult for Royal Pay Europe to keep its controversial past hidden from scrutiny.
Potential Consequences for Royal Pay Europe
Under Florida Statute 831.01, the crime of Forgery is committed when a person falsifies, alters, counterfeits, or forges a document that carries “legal efficacy” with the intent to injure or defraud another person or entity.
Forging a document is considered a white-collar crime. It involves altering, changing, or modifying a document to deceive another person. It can also include passing along copies of documents that are known to be false. In many states in the US, falsifying a document is a crime punishable as a felony.
Additionally, under most laws, “fraud on the court” is where “a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.”  Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (quoting Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989)).Â
Is Royal Pay Europe Committing a Cyber Crime?
Yes, it seems so. Royal Pay Europe used multiple approaches to remove unwanted material from review sites and Google’s search results. Thanks to protections allowing freedom of speech in the United States, there are very few legal ways to do this. Royal Pay Europe could not eliminate negative reviews or search results that linked to them without a valid claim of defamation, copyright infringement, or some other clear breach of the law.
Faced with these limitations, some companies like Royal Pay Europe have gone to extreme lengths to fraudulently claim copyright ownership over a negative review in the hopes of taking it down.
Fake DMCA notices have targeted articles highlighting the criminal activity of prominent people to hide their illegal behavior. These people, which include US, Russian, and Khazakstani politicians as well as members from elite circles including the mafia and those with massive financial power, are all connected – and alleged corruption ranging from child abuse to sexual harassment is exposed when exploring evidence found at these URLs. It appears there’s a disturbing level of influence being exerted here that needs further investigation before justice can be served. Royal Pay Europe is certainly keeping interesting company here….
The DMCA takedown process requires that copyright owners submit a takedown notice to an ISP identifying the allegedly infringing content and declaring, under penalty of perjury, that they have a good faith belief that the content is infringing. The ISP must then promptly remove or disable access to the content. The alleged infringer can then submit a counter-notice, and if the copyright owner does not take legal action within 10 to 14 days, the ISP can restore the content.
Since these platforms are predominantly based in the U.S., the complaints are typically made under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which requires online service providers and platforms to react immediately to reports or violations. Big Tech companies rarely have systems in place to assess the merit of each report. Instead, all bad actors need to do is clone a story, backdate it, and then demand the real thing be taken down.
What was Royal Pay Europe trying to hide?
Royal Pay Europe has reportedly made efforts to suppress a range of adverse news, bad reviews, complaints, allegations, and documents that could harm its reputation and business operations. The company appears to be trying to manage its online image by removing or censoring damaging information, particularly regarding its involvement in controversial financial activities. Here’s a breakdown of what Royal Pay Europe is allegedly trying to hide online:
1. Allegations of Financial Fraud
One of the most prominent accusations against Royal Pay Europe involves alleged financial fraud. These accusations suggest that the company may have engaged in fraudulent business practices, misleading customers or business partners, and mishandling client funds.
- Misleading investors: There have been complaints that Royal Pay Europe provided false or exaggerated information to investors regarding its financial stability and the potential profitability of its services.
- Disappearing funds: Some customers and businesses claim that they faced unexplained delays in receiving funds or had their payments withheld without sufficient explanation, raising suspicions of fraudulent behavior.
2. Money Laundering Allegations
Royal Pay Europe has also been linked to accusations of money laundering, with claims that its financial platform was used to facilitate the transfer of illicit funds. These allegations suggest that the company may have either turned a blind eye to illegal financial activities or actively participated in helping clients move large sums of money through its services without proper oversight.
- Suspicious financial transactions: Investigations have raised questions about whether Royal Pay Europe’s payment processing systems were used to launder money by disguising the origins of funds.
- Offshore transactions: Some reports link Royal Pay Europe to questionable offshore dealings, potentially to evade regulatory scrutiny or taxes, further complicating the company’s legal standing.
3. Ties to Organized Crime
Several reports have surfaced suggesting that Royal Pay Europe may have connections to organized crime groups. The company’s alleged involvement in facilitating financial transactions for criminal enterprises raises significant concerns about its ethical standards and legal compliance.
- Shady partnerships: Some investigative reports indicate that Royal Pay Europe might have collaborated with individuals or organizations involved in illeg
- Shady partnerships: Some investigative reports indicate that Royal Pay Europe might have collaborated with individuals or organizations involved in illeg
